Wednesday, January 31, 2007

The Document Formerly Known as the Constitution

Several key members of our Congress seem to be of the impression that Congress has the ability to remove the "Commander-in-Chief" role of the Executive branch and place it squarely upon the oversized heads in Congress - despite what the Constitution says. According to them, it is they that are able to command our military through committees and political posturing - not the President. Indeed, apparently the President has no power at all when it comes to the military save one thing: the sole power to accept responsibility for defeat. And that is exactly what the President will face responsibility for when the Middle East erupts into chaos as a result of the soon-to-be proposed resolution by Sen. Russell Feingold (D-WI) to defund the military's presence in Iraq within 6 months. This to be done regardless of the resolution's strategic merit. It will not be Russ Feingold who faces the heat for the eventual defeat in Iraq as a result of his bill, it will be President Bush whose "failed policies" caused the defeat.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home